HIV Viral Expression

While field epidemiology  of acute problems share many characteristics with prospectively planned epidemiologic studies ; they may differ in at least three important  aspects , first because field investigations often start  without clear hypothesis they may require the use of descriptive studies to generate hypothesis before analytic studies can be defined and designed and conducted to test these hypothesis , second ; as noted previously ; when acute problems occur there is an immediate need to protect the communitys health and address its concerns. These responsabilities drive the epidemiologic field investigation beyond the confines of data collection and analysis and action  Gregg,M ( 2004). Finally , field epidemiology requires one primary narrative to concider when the data are sufficient to take action rather than ask what additional questions might be answered.

Why is this significant? because this epidemiologic investigative sequence  serves to analyze the operational methodology of the epidemiolgic investigation that lead to the diagnosis of HIV during the 1980s and whether  biological plausability where applied .

A retrospective analysis only raises more questions; one of which is ?where lifestyles a contributing factor in developing HIV virus  contributing factor and yet another question might be :is oxidative stressa contributing factor as well. Last weeks post recommended using homeopathic nterventions as complimentary medicine when rating HIV and AIDS . Another factor to concider is , ? are gene expression a  factor in phenotype development and did scientists foresee the constant mutation of this virus which were never appropriately isolated to begin with . The virus existance rest on particulate matter which hon ad been exposed o a supernatum or growth factor . The controversy surrounding the condition is not the syndrom or AIDS but rather the test sensitivity and specificity which relies upn antibodys formed from the presence of a virus which a person had been exposed to . In additin when we analyze the behavior associated with life styles of a living organism exposed to the virus ; we forget that a single organism has a behavior as well that al?low for the identification of normal and abnormal ; it is abnormal for a virus to behave as a cancer cell which is what this virus does , the term used to identify this anomolly is retrovirus . This leads me to ask the following two questions , ?is tis phenotype a result of autoimmune expression, and why would antiretroviral medication be prescribed to destroy DNA when what should have been done is to protect the DNA which are being attacked by a retrovirus . Strengthening the organism by way that it can fight off the attack of he virus is a better choice in clinical practice not weakening the organism with antiretroviral medication for a virus whose very existence rests on particulate  matter .

Refernces
Gregg , M (2004) Field Epidemiology 3rd ed Oxford University