Since subjects for new social research projects often grow from earlier efforts to study methods of social research these have also evolved ; however when faced with the challenges of cementing credibility it accompanies said social projects in stages . One of the reasons for this is lack of modernized social health models , frameworks , and theories (Baker,2012) . The discrepancy between applicable models that align to modern social ills can be attributed directly to the integration of post positivistic theorem and logic ;rather than neopositivistic theorem and logic . Today social researchers carry out projects that are supported by diverse disciplines such as genetics , Gene editing in tailored health biotechnology , and innovation in steam education . We can no longer base public health on existent determinants of health , HBM or Skinners condualist theory . This also becomes an issue for the social scientists when observational work are being perused and performed that include the observation of behavior ethnographically , when observing tendencies and trends . Validity of new models that are introduced into practice and academia are time consuming and quite lengthy in implementation ; these new models such as The New PHenostyles framework in community assessment deserve to go into trials ; validated and used in behavioral and social research . The PHenostyles Assessment tool is an excellent way of collecting data related to life styles that can be transferred into practice to evaluate phenotipical development and gene editing (Cruz 2017). This is an excellent way of implementing preventative care in public health ; it is cost effective and lowers the burden of disease in such complex topics as environmental exposure , pollution exposure , climate change and adaptation and its affects on health over time .
References
Baker , t.l(1998) Doing Social Research 3rd ed . McGraw Hill Publishing
Cruz ,L (2015) PHenostyles Assessment in Public Health.
No comments:
Post a Comment